It was my first time actually completing a non-fiction book. A few months back I was reading David and Goliath by Malcolm Gladwell but it was so damn dry and factual I just gave up halfway. I never liked giving up on books (and that was what made me toil through Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens a few years back, and I haven't touched a classic since), but non-fiction books are really not my thing.
I deserve a pat on my back for finishing The Lucifer Effect by Dr. Philip Zimbardo. There were some parts where I skimmed through (will get to that) but I still made it to the end of the 500 plus pages YAY.
The infamous Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted in 1971, at Stanford University. Actually, I feel this connection with this controversial psychology experiment because I had actually stood outside Jordan Hall (whose basement the SPE was situated at) back a few years ago on a school trip to SFO.
I'm not gonna elaborate on the SPE itself because I assume everyone should have some knowledge of it. The Lucifer Effect details out the SPE through a day-by-day account, and then extrapolates its findings onto real-life prisons. It then attempts to explain the atrocities of the Abu Ghraib Prison (Iraq 2003) whose leaked photos of torture shook the world. The central theme of Dr. Z's magnum opus is that anyone can have the propensity to do evil ("Banality of evil") even if we think it's completely besides ourselves. But on the flipside, it also means that we are intrinsic heroes.
One main takeaway from this book is that we must be circumspect when making 'dispositional' judgement on someone (meaning that you see someone completely culpable for his actions, disregarding the environment, or 'situational' forces acting upon him). Like the apple analogy that Dr. Z uses throughout: Do bad apples exist because they are inherently bad , or because the barrel in which they reside in is bad? We like to use the former in judgement making because we like to believe that we have the willpower to resist any external situational forces that can alter our perceived "born good"-ness, and that bad apples are just one or two outliers that prove that oops, He makes mistakes too.
No. The SPE shows that normal people can morph into sadistic, violent beings with just a flick of environmental switches. Authority, autonomy, appearance, duty etc. It's actually very, very scary to think about it. Like I know I'm not a sadist nor tyrant, but being aware that deep within my psyche lies a sleeping giant that may be aroused by things I do not have control over is really very scary.
After the part on SPE was the extension to Abu Ghraib. I skipped the reports because there were too much military names to get mix up with. The photos (go google it) are really sickening, what with unnecessary thumbs-up and grins over flagrant torture and abuse. Dr. Z highlights that though situational forces lies beyond the forces of our control, it cannot be used as excuses for our metamorphosis for the worse.
Evil of inaction is something I always believe in. It's a reminder to not remain passive when you see something wrong.
And of course, if Man can fall from grace like Lucifer to Satan, we also can rise up to be one of those unsung heroes, because of "the Banality of Heroism". I loved how the book ended with a succinct quote from The Gulag Archipelago (whatever that is, idk, I just like the quote):
"The line between good and evil is in the center of every human heart."
And yeah, reading this 500 paged non-fiction within a month is made possibly with my lovely piece of electronic. It's just really really convenient to bring my kindle around; on the bus, during work as opposed to the book (borrowed from the library prior to buying my Kindle).
I'm reading Chuck Palahniuk's Haunted now. This page near made me choke on coffee:















